Why Facebook's Comment Filtering is More Than Just Convenience

Since its inception, the internet has been a place where we refuse to deal with reality, a realm where imaginary worlds and alternative realities thrive. In this context, it is unsurprising that individuals and entities such as Mark Zuckerberg, Google, and the New York Times would engage in tactics like comment section closures or illusory filtering measures. These actions aim to create a fabricated version of reality, catering to the agendas of those in control rather than the convenience or edification of users.

Managing Real People's Intellectual Contributions

Contrary to popular perceptions, managing real human interactions and their intellectual contributions was never a priority. Instead, the primary objective is to keep individuals engaged within a specific construct, stifling their voices and reducing their autonomy. This manipulation is particularly pronounced when dealing with naturally controversial topics that could rock the boat. The goal is to maintain a sanitized, controlled environment, often at the expense of raw and unfiltered reality.

The Role of Low-Life Self-Appointed Arbitrators

Content moderation, in the pre-COVID era, was often seen as a way to combat misinformation, but it is rooted in much deeper human behavior. The desire to dictate who can speak, how they can speak, and even the basic ability to identify friends or foes can be traced back to the concept of the Tower of Babel. Every generation produces individuals with a puppetmaster mentality—those who believe they can force peace, although they are often at the root of the conflict.

Free Speech and Power Addiction

The argument that blocking free speech in the name of maintaining order, akin to the "fire in a crowd" analogy, is misinformed. Observers will often make their own assessments and continue on their path without being swayed by false alarms. Those who seek power over others and are fixated on micromanagement should recognize that they are the ones in need of serious counseling, not the individuals exercising free speech.

Government Overreach and Violation of Free Speech

Finally, the pressure on social media platforms to moderate content by the government can also be seen as a violation of free speech. Applying excessive regulations to access information is still a form of covert sabotage. Governments that dictate what can and cannot be shared on social media platforms are ultimately undermining the very principles of freedom of speech that make the internet so powerful.

In conclusion, Facebook's comment filtering is more than just a convenient tool; it is a means of control and manipulation. Understanding the underlying motives behind these actions is crucial for users to navigate the complex landscape of online discourse. As we move forward, it is essential to advocate for transparency and true freedom of expression in the digital realm.