Why Are Incels/MGTOW Forums Banned From Most Social Media Sites?

The banning of incel and MGTOW forums from most social media sites is a complex phenomenon with roots in both societal and business factors. This article explores the multi-faceted reasons behind these bans, delving into the underlying motives and the impact on both users and platforms.

Government and Corporate Interests

The simple reason for the banning of incel and MGTOW forums is often attributed to the interests of governments and large corporations. These groups view men as the primary economic workhorses, primarily responsible for generating revenue and paying taxes. Social media platforms, driven by corporate interests, aim to maximize user engagement while fostering community and consumer loyalty.

When individuals opt to remain single or do not form families, they tend to be less driven by the pursuit of high incomes. Instead, they may choose to live on a minimum wage and enjoy a simpler lifestyle. This does not align with the business models of large corporations, which thrive on consumerism and high levels of productivity and engagement. Similarly, governments require a populace that is industrious and tax-paying.

Impact on Business Strategies

A significant aspect of the ban is the negative impact such forums can have on business. The spending patterns observed in most men often revolve around impressing, attracting, and maintaining relationships with women. MGTOW education, however, arms men with insights into women's nature and the societal constructs (the matrix) they navigate. This enlightenment can lead to a rejection of both women and societal norms, which directly affects the market dynamics and consumer behavior.

By educating men to walk away, MGTOW encourages a lifestyle that is less economically beneficial for businesses. This not only impacts direct consumer spending but also affects the social signaling culture, where men are often seen as financial assets or trophies. As a result, these forums face heavy pressure to be muted or removed from public platforms.

Social Media Policies and User Behavior

Another reason for the banning of incel and MGTOW forums is the violation of terms of service (TOS) and policies related to incitement to violence or hate speech. While some individuals within these forums may engage in such activities, the platforms often generalize the behavior across the board, leading to blanket bans.

Further, these forums often serve as a means for large numbers of users to congregate and discuss issues that are outside the mainstream social conversation. Many users remain vocal about these topics, seeking validation and a sense of community. However, it is arguable that these discussions could lead to the formation of coalitions that could potentially incite real-world harm.

The Philosophy Behind MGTOW and Incel Forums

A key aspect of these forums is their philosophy of non-conformity and self-reliance. Advocates of MGTOW and incel communities seek to separate themselves from societal norms and economic expectations, framing it as a lifestyle choice. These individuals believe in the inherent value of men living their lives independent of women and traditional societal structures.

However, this non-conformity is often disrupted by the very platforms they use, which place restrictions on such behaviors. The core issue is that these forums offer a form of validation and support, which is precisely what large corporations and governments aim to control and monetize. By banning these forums or suppressing their voices, social media platforms can achieve a balance between user content and their financial and social objectives.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the banning of incel and MGTOW forums on major social media sites can be attributed to a combination of government and corporate interests, business strategies, and the need to maintain a certain level of user behavior and content. While these forums provide a space for dissent and non-conformity, they also face constant scrutiny and are subject to bans or suspensions.

The future of these communities lies in their ability to adapt to changing landscapes, whether in the form of alternative platforms, offline communities, or by evolving their strategies to navigate the digital space more effectively.

Keywords: incels, MGTOW, social media bans, non-conformity, self-reliance, terms of service, hate speech, user behavior, government interests, corporate interests, social media policies.