Why American Liberals Aren't Moving to France: An Analysis

The recent statement by President Emmanuel Macron of France, suggesting that American liberals could seek asylum to escape the post-Trump era in the United States, has sparked dialogues on both sides of the Atlantic. However, the invitation appears to be limited to individuals with specific interests, rather than a broad appeal to liberals as a whole.

Macron's Specific Invitation

While President Macron has expressed support for those who wish to work in climate, environmental, and energy sectors, his statement does not amount to an open invitation to all American liberals. He specifically mentions individuals interested in these fields, ranging from scientists to policymakers. This narrow focus is in stark contrast to the general desire often expressed by many American liberals for a broader shift in governance and societal values.

For instance, in his speech, Macron stated:

I do think Trump is a scourge on our nation. I also think that as a person who loves my country it is my responsibility to stay here and oppose him, his agenda, and his supporters. When something you love is in danger, you don’t run. You do what you can to call out the BS, highlight the danger, and work for change.

This sentiment strongly resonates with many American liberals who, like the loyal citizens of any nation, prefer to face challenges head-on within their home country rather than seek refuge abroad.

A Different Historical Context

The mention of French history—such as the assistance provided during World War II to fight against Nazi Germany—highlights another significant factor. The U.S.-France alliance in the earlier decades has robust foundations, anchored in shared values and a deep sense of camaraderie. The last significant migration of American liberals to France, for the purpose of fighting against a Nazi regime, occurred during a time of shared peril, uniting people in a common cause.

Today, the context and global landscape are far different. While there are certainly issues that need addressing within the United States, the ongoing interaction with the White House indicates that the U.S. has the ability to recover and adapt. Therefore, the idea of American liberals seeking refuge in France seems less appealing and more indicative of an existential threat that may be overemphasized.

Regional and National Identity

Additionally, the suggestion that American liberals might trade citizenship for asylum in a foreign land is highly contentious. American liberals see their identity inextricably linked to the values and freedoms enshrined in the Constitution and the bold aspirations of a republic. Liberals have historically worked to preserve and expand these values, often granting them the status of a sacred trust. As a result, the idea of seeking asylum as ex-patriots on distant shores strikes many as foreign and perhaps even disingenuous.

The call to action for liberals to remain and fight for their country emphasizes the importance of grassroots participation and the power of collective effort in driving change. This aligns with historical figures like Franklin D. Roosevelt and his New Deal, which sought to bring about substantial reforms and improve the lives of Americans during the Great Depression. The essence of being liberal remains firmly rooted in the idea of being part of and contributing to the fabric of American society.

Macron's approach, while well-intentioned, may miss the mark in addressing the broader concerns and aspirations of American liberals. Instead of seeking refuge, many might find greater solidarity and efficacy in supporting the people and leaders within their own country who share their vision for a better future. While there are certainly challenges to be addressed, the potential for change within the system remains a compelling reason for staying and working from within.