The Netanyahu-Biden Impasse: Reflections on Diplomatic Tensions and Regional Alliances

Given the recent shift in political landscapes and ongoing tensions in Middle Eastern diplomacy, it is essential to revisit the meeting between Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli Prime Minister, and Joe Biden, the current US President. Despite the initial headline suggesting a break in diplomatic relations, this article aims to delve into the complexities and nuances of the relationship between Netanyahu and Biden, as well as the broader implications for Israel-US relations.

The Unbroken Diplomatic Ties

It is important to clarify that there has been no significant repair in relations since they were never broken to begin with. Netanyahu, as well as Vice President Kamala Harris, did meet with Biden on schedule. While these meetings may have been contentious, they were necessary for the continuation of a diplomatic dialogue, crucial for maintaining geopolitical stability in the region.

President Biden's Withdrawal of Presidential Candidacy

President Joe Biden's recent announcement that he has withdrawn his candidacy for a second presidential election underscores the complexity of political shifts. If Biden was genuinely interested in speaking with Netanyahu regarding key foreign policy issues, he would have made such a statement. However, his withdrawal suggests a different priority, specifically the upcoming midterm elections and a shift in political focus.

Netanyahu's Treatment of Biden and US Diplomats

Netanyahu's treatment of Biden and US diplomats has been characterized by a combination of contempt and defiance. This attitude has been exacerbated by the presence of a fifth-column in Washington, which some perceive as exerting undue influence over the US leadership. This has placed Israel's standing in a precarious position, particularly in the context of upcoming elections and the broader geopolitical landscape.

Israel's influential role in the US has been akin to that of Ukraine, with both countries receiving significant attention and support from the US administration. However, the new term of the US presidency is unlikely to prioritize Israel's interests over the increasingly urgent matters of domestic policy and international relations, such as the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and the fallout from the global health pandemic.

The Paradox of Support and Opposition

Kamala Harris, the current Vice President, has been vocal in her opposition to Israel's actions, particularly the potential genocidal policies and the ongoing annexation of Palestinian territories. This opposition has been driven by a shift in political ideology, with Harris aligning herself more closely with progressive values that prioritize human rights and democratic principles over geopolitical interests.

Similarly, former President Donald Trump's support for Israel was driven by a combination of ideological and financial interests. However, Trump's stated desire for tax cuts and support from billionaire donors has leaned towards a pragmatic, rather than ideological, approach. His focus on domestic issues has led to a reduction in US involvement in neo-colonial tyranny, which has implications for Israel's future in the US political landscape.

A New Era for Israel: From Fascism to Futurism

As Israel faces a critical juncture in its political and economic future, it is essential to re-examine the role of its leadership and its alignment with global trends. The leadership of Netanyahu has been characterized by a mix of fascist and neo-colonial elements, which have been detrimental to Israel's standing in the international community. This has led to a re-evaluation of the country's position as an ally in the Middle East, necessitating a shift towards a more progressive and democratic future.

The concept of the "empire" as it existed post-World War II is no longer applicable to Israel, as it seeks to define its place in an increasingly interconnected and complex world. Israel must look towards a future where it prioritizes human rights, democracy, and sustainable development, rather than the pursuit of colonial dominance and partisan interests. This realignment is essential for Israel's long-term stability and success in the global arena.

Zionism, in its current form, faces significant challenges and criticisms. It is no longer seen as a noble and respected movement but rather as a movement that perpetuates inequality and oppression. As such, it is crucial for Israel to consider alternative visions of nationalism and leadership that embrace inclusivity, diversity, and equality. The future of Israel in 2025 and beyond will be determined by its willingness to embrace these changes.

In conclusion, the relationship between Netanyahu and Biden is a complex and multifaceted issue that goes beyond individual personalities and political affiliations. It reflects broader trends in global politics, the evolving nature of US-Israel relations, and the urgent need for Israel to adapt to changing geopolitical realities. As the world enters a new era, it is imperative for Israel to reconsider its approach to leadership, policy, and international engagement to ensure a brighter and more stable future.