Introduction

By the 1960s, telegrams, these unique forms of communication, had begun to fade from daily usage even though they were still in use. This article explores the reasons behind this decline and the context in which telegrams were once a vital tool for communication.

The Fading Era of Telegrams

During the mid-20th century, telegrams were a preferred method of communication for urgent and formal messages. However, by the 1960s, their popularity began to wane. No longer the primary mode of urgent communication, telegrams were still used occasionally, as the story of the Western Union man with the telegram at the front door illustrates. Families and individuals alike found themselves on alert when they saw this messenger, knowing that it often heralded bad news.

The Speed and Security of Telegrams

Telegrams were faster than mail and far more cost-effective than long-distance phone calls. Unlike a phone call, which often involved calling the operator and arranging a time that suited both parties, telegrams provided a speedy and reliable form of communication. This was particularly important in an era when phone lines were not as advanced and could be disturbed or affected by weather.

Privacy Concerns and Technical Issues

Phone calls carried with them a significant issue of privacy. With party lines and the possibility of eavesdropping, many people found them less than secure. In contrast, telegrams were more private and less susceptible to interception. This made them a favored choice for sensitive communications, especially in business and government settings.

The Telegram as a Legal Document

Another key aspect of telegrams was their legal nature. Like certified mail, telegrams were often used as formal documents, due to their immediate and verifiable nature. Businesses, organizations, and government institutions relied heavily on telegrams for notifications and confirmations.

Government Usage in Times of Crisis

One of the most significant roles of telegrams in the 1960s was their use by the government, particularly during wartime. During the Vietnam War, the U.S. Department of Defense (Pentagon) made extensive use of telegrams to inform next of kin about wounded or killed service members. The telegram's expediency and formality made it ideal for such critical communications.

Conclusion

The decline of telegrams in the 1960s was a result of technological advancements and changing communication habits. Despite their reliability and immediacy, telegrams could not compete with the speed and convenience of newer technologies like the telephone and fax. However, their legacy remains, serving as a moment in time when a unique form of communication played a vital role in society's daily functioning.