Limiting Presidential Pardon Power: A Constitutional Amendment Proposal

The President's power to pardon is a significant aspect of the American legal system, but its unbounded nature raises concerns about potential abuse and ethical considerations. This essay explores whether the current system should be reformed and proposes an amendment to the Constitution to limit the President's ability to pardon, specifically addressing self-pardons and those that involve federal crimes.

Introduction

The President's power to pardon (the 'pardon power') is derived from Article II of the United States Constitution. This power is extensive and applies to cases of offenses against the United States, including those arising from violations of federal law. It is a fundamental power that ensures the President can forgive offenses and avoid excessive punishment. However, it is not without its drawbacks. For instance, the President is not restricted by location and can pardon individuals even if they are outside the United States.

Current Limitations and Issues

Currently, the President can pardon individuals convicted of federal crimes but cannot pardon them for federal crimes committed outside the United States. There is, however, an absence of a constitutional restriction on the President's ability to pardon himself or herself, or to pardon any federal crime in which the President is a suspect or involved. This lack of limitation raises serious concerns about the balance of power and the ability of the judiciary to maintain impartiality in the face of potential self-pardons.

The Case for Limitation

Several aspects of the current pardon power warrant re-evaluation and potential restriction. First, the power to pardon, especially for self-pardons, undermines the principles of the rule of law. The rule of law maintains that no one, not even the highest officials, is above the law. Self-pardons can erode public trust and confidence in the justice system, creating a perception that the legal process is flawed or corrupt. Second, the unrestricted nature of the pardon power can lead to abuse, particularly if the President is facing legal challenges or investigations, as these pardons can protect individuals involved, including the President's associates.

A Proposed Constitutional Amendment

To address these concerns, a constitutional amendment could be proposed. The amendment would specifically restrict the President's ability to pardon, particularly in cases of self-pardons and offenses committed by the President. Here is a proposed constitutional amendment:

"Whereas the traditions of the rule of law include the principle that no man shall stand in judgment of himself, the following statement shall be appended to the first paragraph of Section 2 of the President's pardon power:

No President shall pardon himself or herself for any offense against the United States. No President shall use the pardon power to prevent or hinder the due process of law in any manner that compromise the impartiality of the judicial or legislative branches of government. This amendment does not limit the President's ability to pardon others, provided such pardons are not used in contravention of the Constitution or in a manner that undermines the rule of law.

Passed the Congress of the United States thirty days after the date of its adoption by two-thirds of the House of Representatives and one-half of the State legislatures.

"

Conclusion

The President's power to pardon is a critical aspect of the American legal system. However, its current framework allows for potential abuse and undermines the principle of the rule of law. A constitutional amendment that restricts self-pardons and abuses of the pardon power would be a step towards ensuring that the President's actions uphold judicial integrity and public trust. Such a change would also align with the principles of democratic governance and the rule of law.

The suggested amendment aims to balance the need for clemency with the requirement for accountability and impartiality. By enacting this amendment, the country could ensure that the pardon power is used responsibly and in a manner that upholds the values of justice and fairness.