Exploring the Realities of Scapegoating and Collective Responsibility in Quarantine Hotels

In recent months, Melbourne has found itself once again under strict lockdown measures, with a particular focus on quarantine hotels. The debate around accountability and the accuracy of accusations has sparked intense discussions, often filled with emotion and a push to find scapegoats. This article seeks to explore the complexities of these issues, drawing insights from historical and contemporary perspectives.

Historical Context and the End of Trial by Accusation

The idea of trial by accusation, long banned in modern societies, would seem an anachronism in today's legal framework. Yet, the human tendency to blame others in times of crisis is a persistent phenomenon. My mother once faced such a situation, where accusations against family members led to her crusade against drugs. Though societies have evolved to outlaw such practices, historical patterns tend to repeat. As we face the challenges posed by the outbreak of Covid-19 in quarantine hotels, it is crucial to understand and address the psychological underpinnings of such behavior.

Misdiagnosis and the Complexity of Medical Research

Medical research, even in the age of advanced technology, is fraught with uncertainties and challenges. My experience as a gastro-intestinal anatomist has taught me that all medical doctors are wrong 85% of the time in determining the cause of death. This is especially true for conditions like Corona-19, whose diagnosis can take up to 18 months by the time it reaches the Coroner's Court. Furthermore, the process of confirming certain medical hypotheses, such as the transmission distance of certain viruses, can take months, if not years. This highlights the complexity and unpredictability of medical research and diagnosis.

The Psychology of Scapegoating and Mob Justice

In times of disruption and uncertainty, such as during Melbourne's current lockdowns, the lizard brain often seeks to find scapegoats to alleviate collective guilt. Human nature has a long history of redirecting vindictive violence, as René Girard discusses in his works. However, with the rise of social media, this instinct has become more potent, leading to mob justice and the spread of misinformation.

There are those who argue that strict lockdowns and the re-opening of quarantine hotels are necessary to control the outbreak. However, accusations and the desire for scapegoats can cloud rational decision-making. For instance, accusations against security guards for passing the virus to the community have led to calls for carnage. Yet, it is essential to remember that experts and institutions are working to mitigate the crisis, and that mild measures, such as the Stage 3 Lockdown, have shown some efficacy.

Addressing the Exacerbation of the Crisis and the Role of Vigilantism

The recent police response to quarantine hotel residents has sparked further debate. Critics argue that such actions have contributed to an increase in the outbreak rather than a mitigation of it. The involvement of vigilantes, or groups of people acting outside of official channels, can exacerbate the situation, leading to a self-fulfilling prophecy of chaos and panic. It is crucial for the public to trust the experts and the institutions responsible for public health, rather than lashing out at specific groups or individuals.

Conclusion: Moving Away from Scapegoating and Towards Rationality

In the face of such challenges, it is important to resist the urge to name and shame those believed to be responsible for the outbreak in quarantine hotels. Instead, we must focus on rational, evidence-based approaches to address the crisis. Disabling comments and disabling comment sections can be effective measures to reduce the spread of misinformation and protect public discourse. By focusing on collective responsibility and reasoned dialogue, we can work towards a more united and effective response to the Covid-19 outbreak in Melbourne.