Socializing
Exploring the Housing First Approach to Homelessness
Exploring the Housing First Approach to Homelessness
The 'housing first' approach to homelessness is a controversial and often misunderstood concept. Critics argue that it allows for the destruction of housing and the cycle of moving individuals into new, destroyed homes. However, proponents emphasize the transformative potential of providing immediate and permanent housing, enabling individuals to focus on recovery and independence.
Controversies Surrounding the Housing First Model
The housing first model involves taxpayers providing permanent housing to the homeless at above-market rates. These homes are usually handed over with no conditions attached, and often end up in a state of disrepair due to the actions of the occupants. This ruined housing is then sold to private companies at below-market rates, resulting in substantial profits. After the initial destruction, these companies rehabilitate the properties and resell them. The cycle repeats, with the homeless moving into yet another place to destroy. This cycle is not only unsustainable but also controversial, as it appears to exploit the vulnerable for financial gain.
Impact and Benefits of the Housing First Approach
The housing first model seeks to provide permanent housing for the homeless in shelters before they have a job or means to pay. This approach aims to free up space in temporary shelters, providing a foundation for individuals to pursue work, education, and access to wrap-around services. By offering stable housing, individuals are better equipped to address their issues, leading to a healthier and more motivated attitude toward independence. Initially, many emphasize the need for individuals to find work or undergo training. However, this can be incredibly challenging for those still struggling with addiction or mental health issues, which often make it difficult to secure employment.
The Bureaucratic Perspective
The emphasis on finding work or training is part of a broader bureaucratic effort to funnel money into organizations that help people transition into housing. Once housed, these individuals gain access to a myriad of services, such as addiction and mental health treatment. While this model has its merits, my personal experience with the homeless reveals a significant flaw. Individuals who are still actively involved in addiction are often the ones who struggle to maintain housing once they are housed outside their comfort zones. Loneliness and a lack of support can exacerbate their issues, leading to frequent moves and unstable living situations. For instance, recently finding a roommate who moved inside and stabilizing the living conditions has made a substantial difference for me.
Five Core Principles of Housing First
The housing first model adheres to five core principles:
Immediate Access to Housing: Individuals are provided with permanent housing immediately, without requiring that they be "housing ready." Choice in Placement: Individuals have the choice in terms of where they are housed and what supports they receive. Recovery-Oriented: The focus is on individual well-being, not just meeting immediate needs. Supports are tailored to the individual's needs and desires. Community/Social Integration: The model aims to help individuals reintegrate into the community, supporting them to go back to work, make friends, and become part of the community.While the ideal version of the housing first approach aligns with these principles, not all programs fully implement them. Many programs draw from aspects of the housing first model, but some fall short in delivering the comprehensive and personalized support that individuals need to succeed.
Conclusion
The housing first approach to homelessness aims to break the cycle of instability by providing permanent housing and access to essential services. While challenges remain, these efforts hold great promise for offering vulnerable individuals the stability and support they need to rebuild their lives. It is crucial to recognize the complexity of homelessness and the potential for unintended consequences in the implementation of such programs.