Debunking Gender Identity: A Case Against the Myths Surrounding Sexual Stereotypes and Corporate Exploitation

The modern discourse on gender identity often obfuscates fundamental truths about biological reality and perpetuates harmful stereotypes. In this piece, we delve into the complexities of understanding ourselves on a deeper level through discussions around gender identity. We also examine the role of organizations like the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) and the myths they propagate that benefit corporate interests at the expense of genuine communities.

Ancillary Gender: The Fallacy of Change

It's important to establish a foundational truth: human beings are born with one of two biological genders—male or female—from conception until death. This is a biological fact that applies to humans and animals alike. The contemporary notion that individuals can change their gender is both scientifically unsupported and absurd. It challenges the very biological reality that defines us.

The Role of Discussions and Bullies

Discussions about gender identity can be enlightening, but unfortunately, they often attract those who are more interested in bullying than in understanding. The author identifies themselves as a gender abolitionist, rejecting the concept of gender entirely. They argue that sexual stereotypes are not only non-existent but also harmful.

Exploitation by the Human Rights Campaign (HRC)

The HRC is perhaps one of the most vocal proponents of gender identity ideology. Founded in 1980 to support lesbian and gay rights, the organization has transformed into a force that seeks to erase traditional gender identities while appropriating the rights and goodwill of other sexual minorities. The HRC's website claims it has over three million members and supporters, making it a significant influencer in the American landscape.

National Emergency or Empty Dramatics?

The HRC and other advocacy groups often present issues facing LGBTQ individuals as a national emergency. Their rhetoric often includes dramatic claims about violence, forced migrations, and homophobia. However, many sane individuals, including many gay and lesbian people, view these claims as exaggerated and misleading.

The Reality of Sexual Orientation

For the author, there are no "LGBTQ people." Instead, there are females, males, lesbians, gay men, and bisexual people. Lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals share minority sexual orientations, while others falsify their sex and sexuality for corporate gain. The author argues that the "LGB" and "TQ" acronyms are conflations that dilute the true meaning of sexual orientation.

Corporate Interests vs. Gender Identity

The use of acronyms like "LGBTQ" serves corporate interests by creating a false sense of unity among diverse groups. The author points out that a "TQ" label erases sex and sexual orientation, benefiting the powerful while harming the historically oppressed. This exploitative dynamic has concrete consequences, with lesbians facing demonization from both the left and the right.

Conclusion

Understanding ourselves on a deeper level requires a return to biological and logical truths. Gender identity discussions should focus on respect and understanding, not on misguided attempts to redefine reality. The author argues that true advocacy must prioritize the well-being of all individuals and not be co-opted for corporate or ideological gain.

By debunking the myths surrounding gender identity and standing against exploitation, we can foster a more inclusive and truthful society where everyone can thrive.