Choosing the Right Terminology for Autism: 'Autistic People' vs 'People with Autism'

The terms 'autistic people' and 'people with autism' have long been debated within the autism community. While both terms are commonly used, they carry different connotations and reflect different perspectives. This article explores the nuances of these terms and the importance of respecting individual preferences in this ongoing discourse.

Understanding ‘Autistic People’

The term 'autistic people' is often preferred by those in the autism community. This phrase emphasizes that autism is an inherent part of a person's identity, rather than a condition to be cured or fixed. The neurodiversity movement promotes the idea that autism is a fundamental aspect of human diversity that should be embraced, not eliminated. Many autistic individuals see themselves as 'autistic' because it validates their unique experiences and ways of viewing the world.

The Neurodiversity Perspective

The neurodiversity movement argues that neurological differences, including autism, are natural variations within the human experience, similar to other aspects of individual differences. By using the term 'autistic people,' this community seeks to affirm the identity and contributions of autistic individuals, recognizing that they bring valuable perspectives and skills to society.

Exploring 'People with Autism'

'People with autism' is a more traditional term that has been widely used for decades. This phrase is often associated with a medical or clinical perspective, where autism is seen as a condition or a diagnosis. It can sometimes imply a separation between the individual and their autism, suggesting that autism is external to the person and may be seen as a deficit or disorder.

The Medical and Clinical Perspective

From a medical standpoint, the term 'people with autism' reflects the diagnostic approach taken by healthcare professionals. This term is often used in the context of research, diagnosis, and treatment, where the focus is on identifying and addressing supposed issues related to autism. While this approach can be helpful in some contexts, it can also perpetuate negative stereotypes and stigmatization.

Personal Preferences and Identity

Ultimately, the choice of terminology is deeply personal and can vary based on individual preference, cultural context, and the specific community being addressed. Some autistic individuals prefer the term 'autistic people,' while others may prefer 'people with autism' or even 'autistics.' It is crucial to respect the language that individuals or communities prefer, as this can make a significant difference in how they are perceived and interacted with in society.

Examples of Personal Preferences

A recent personal reflection from an autistic individual highlighted this sentiment: 'Personally, I would rather be called an "autist." ' This preference reflects the individual's identification with the term 'autist' as a valid and non-pathologizing descriptor of their experience.

Language and Grammar Considerations

In addition to personal preference, there are also language and grammatical considerations. Autistic is an adjective, whereas autist is a noun. For instance, one might say 'an autist like me' or 'an autistic person like me.' It is grammatically incorrect and can be seen as offensive to some to say 'an autistic' without a noun following. Similarly, terms like 'a Jewish' or 'a black' are typically not used this way, as it dehumanizes the individual. The correct phrasing would be 'an autistic person' or 'an autist.' Some individuals avoid using the term 'autist' altogether due to its potential associations with derogatory language ('artist' has a similar negative connotation before it became positive). Instead, they prefer 'autistic person' to maintain a respectful and accurate description.

Conclusion

The terminology used when referring to autism is an important aspect of respect and understanding. While 'autistic people' and 'people with autism' are both valid terms, it is crucial to use language that reflects the values and preferences of the community being addressed. By recognizing and respecting individual preferences, we can create a more inclusive and empathetic society that values diversity and accepts people for who they are.